Call Us +1-555-555-555
Jason Beeho • Sep 20, 2021
Photo by Maksim Goncharenok from Pexels

By Jason Beeho, September 20, 2021


Mandatory Vaccination Protocols in the Workplace – Get with the program, or else (?)


On August 17, 2021, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that the government would implement a policy of mandatory vaccination for all federal public servants, subject only to exclusions for “legitimate medical reason[s]”. He went on to caution that, for those public service employees who refuse to be vaccinated, “there will be consequences.”


As at this writing, one month later, mandatory vaccination policies have been rolled out for public servants at all levels of government, and by private employers – large and small – across the country.


Typically, those policies identify a deadline by which employees must verify that they are fully vaccinated; and those deadlines are coming fast. Moreover, with COVID’s “4th wave” dominating the headlines (and with Alberta, in particular, reeling from a surge in cases), those deadlines are unlikely to be extended.


And when those deadlines run out, what will be the “consequences” for employees who have refused to be vaccinated?

There is every reason to believe that those consequences will be severe.


If an employer can demonstrate that a mandatory vaccination policy is a reasonable and justifiable component of its occupational health and safety strategy (and, in most cases, it will be), then willful non-compliance with that policy (again, subject to exceptions for legitimate medical reasons) will amount to willful misconduct. Willful misconduct amounts to “just cause” for dismissal. And in the event of “just cause”, an employer is not obliged to provide notice of termination, termination pay, or severance pay.


In other words, an employee who refuses to comply with a mandatory vaccination policy is not only putting his or her employment at risk, but is inviting termination for “just cause” – i.e. without a severance package. 


At present, many employers are allowing for alternatives – at least temporarily. For example, unvaccinated employees may be permitted to continue remote working arrangements for a period of time, may be permitted to attend at the workplace subject to providing proof of negative COVID test results multiple times per week, or may be offered a brief “grace period” in the form of an unpaid leave of absence during which they might re-consider the choice to remain unvaccinated.


But, in most sectors, employees should not expect such allowances to last.


And nor should they make the mistake of believing that a “personal choice” to remain unvaccinated will somehow attract the protection of human rights legislation, or that employers will lack the resolve to proceed with “just cause” terminations. 


More to the point, refusing to comply with a workplace vaccination policy will in most cases present no legitimate opportunity to claim a severance package or other damages. 


Although there is hardly perfect consensus on the issue, there is no mistaking the direction of the prevailing winds. Mandatory vaccination policies are becoming the “new normal” for Ontario workplaces; and, stated bluntly, employees are being presented with a choice – either get with the program. . . or else.


DUNTRUNE NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP

Duntrune Blog

By Matt Dewar 12 Sep, 2023
Why Knicks' lawsuit against Raptors might not be a big deal 
13 Jan, 2023
When should an employee worry that their off-duty misconduct may give rise to termination for cause?
sent packing
By Michael F. Lee 26 Oct, 2021
The pandemic’s impact on Canada’s economy has resulted in job losses across a wide array of sectors. As more employees are let go, judges are continually tasked with determining whether and how the economic downturn should be taken into account in assessing employees’ termination entitlements.
COVID Vaccine
By Jason Beeho 23 Aug, 2021
In recent days, we have seen the Federal government announce that – subject only to limited exceptions – all of its public service employees must be fully vaccinated. The Ontario provincial government quickly followed suit with a similar pronouncement, as did the City of Toronto. So has the TTC, and – as at this writing – numerous universities and four of Canada’s major banks.
By Israel Balter 11 Aug, 2021
For Ontario’s employers, the contemporary challenge of hiring staff is characterized by attracting talent that meets core competencies and rudimentary work habits and retaining them. It would be understandable that companies would seek a measure of assurance that the employees that they hire will stay with them. The costs incurred in training staff are as often as not a wasted investment in a market dominated by a mobile workforce exhibiting little fealty to their employers and aggravated by recurrent lockdowns.
Termination Letter
By Matthew Dewar 16 Mar, 2021
The Significance of the Termination Letter: You will be bound by what you put it writing regardless of the seriousness of the misconduct.
With the Supreme Court denying leave in Waksdale, what can employers do to limit exposure?
By Matthew Dewar 18 Jan, 2021
With the Supreme Court of Canada denying leave to appeal in Waksdale, what can employers do to limit exposure?
Ontario employers can breathe a little easier today in assuring that essential staff show up to work
By Israel Balter 14 Jan, 2021
Ontario employers can breathe a little easier today in assuring that essential staff show up to work.
Seeking a settlement from cash strapped companies could be futile in the midst of a pandemic.
By Ewan Christie 31 Dec, 2020
Seeking a settlement from cash strapped companies could be futile in the midst of a pandemic.
fired; terminated; terminated without cause; just cause; cause for discharge
By Ewan Christie 28 Dec, 2020
Steps employers should take to reduce risk and treat employees respectfully.
More Posts
Share by: